How do you know you’re threatening the establishment? When the major parties, the mainstream media, and the supposed experts are going after you on a daily basis.
And this is exactly what is happening to Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI).
Since announcing her candidacy for president, Gabbard has been attacked by both sides, though it has been slanted heavily on the left (SEE: PUTIN PUPPET: Media already attacking Tulsi Gabbard).
Why? Because she is anti-war, opposes regime change, refuses to buy the Pentagon narrative, and will not regurgitate NPC talking points about President Donald Trump and Russia.
Ostensibly, this disqualifies her from running for president, says Former Democratic National Committee Chairman and failed presidential candidate Howard Dean.
Appearing on the Counterfeit News Network this week, Dean said that all the Democratic candidates – declared or otherwise – are qualified for the job, except for Gabbard.
When asked if Joe Biden should enter the contest, Dean responded:
“Well, that’s his personal choice. I’ve already said what I had to say about turning the page on … my generation. But … Joe Biden is a good guy and people like Joe Biden a lot. He’s run before and hasn’t been able to win.
I mean I’m really not going to take sides in this. There are no candidates, with one exception, that I really don’t think should be president.”
Who is that one exception?
Tulsi Gabbard. I don’t think she knows what she’s doing and I don’t think she … is qualified. She’s not qualified.
About her dalliances with [Syrian President Bashar Assad], her statements about gay people. … I don’t know what she thinks she’s doing.
Of course, Dean knew what he was doing when he shouted “yahh” to the audiences. If only Gabbard embraced this political strategy, then perhaps she’d be qualified to run for president.
Hey Howard: You only have one vote.
Ms. Gabbard may not be the person you vote for, but I don’t care. How is she not qualified, but you think you were in 2004?